Sexual violence produces detrimental and long-lasting physical and psychological trauma that deters a victim’s ability to fully participate in the economic, political and social development of their community and nation-state (Legal Action Worldwide, 2014). To fight this crime, the UNDP has developed an International Sexual Violence Protocol. This Protocol recommends consolidation of sexual violence legislation into one document called the Sexual Offense Act. These laws tend to use a justice through rights approach to effectively criminalize and prosecute sexual violence within a comprehensive human rights-based model. By using a justice over human rights-based approach; Kenya’s Sexual Offense Act (KSOA) deviated from the UNDP’s recommended human rights-based approach. This deviation has earned Kenya criticism in the Best Practice Report written by LAW and commissioned by UNDP which states that Kenya did not follow a human rights-based and comprehensive approach (Legal Action Worldwide, 2014). The current thesis uses qualitative research methodology to analyze why and how Kenya deviated from the UNDP recommended approach. In doing so, the thesis presents Kenya as a case study that offers a complex and diverse legal, constitutional, and peaceful historical past and that allows in-depth analysis of the role that culture plays in influencing Kenya’s Act. The thesis contends that Kenya did use both comprehensive and human rights-based approaches but that were situated in Kenya’s African feminist and postcolonial cultural context. The primary documentation used and referenced in this study includes KSOA 2006, The Best Practice Report, international protocols and treaties that govern GBV, the Kenyan national plan framework, the constitution of Kenya 2010, as well as regional protocols, and treaties. This work also uses secondary sources such as Kenyan public documentation, academic journals internet-based articles, journals and blogs.
|Advisor:||Edozie, Rita Kiki|
|Commitee:||Kowert, Paul, Ali, Nada|
|School:||University of Massachusetts Boston|
|Department:||Public Affairs/International Relations (MS)|
|School Location:||United States -- Massachusetts|
|Source:||MAI 81/7(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||International Relations, African Studies|
|Keywords:||African feminism, Feminism, Gender rights, Human rights, Post-colonial feminism|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be