The purpose of the dissertation is to examine the language used to discuss disability and the attitudes and perceptions that the general American public has about people living with disabilities. Using the transformative research and evaluation method, the content analysis study examines the use of “deficit perspective language” versus “non-deficit perspective language” as defined by Mertens in materials available to the general American public that address the five areas described in the World Health Organization matrix on community rehabilitation for people with disabilities. The mixed methods study explores both the frequency of deficit perspective language and the frequency non- deficit perspective language as well as the themes such language conveys to the general public. The research provides person centered perspectives addressing academic literature gaps relating to the topic of disability from a non-clinical perspective, using muted group theory, complexity theory, social justice theory and critical disability theory. From a conflict resolution perspective, the study aims to provide insight and ideas based on Mayer’s paradoxes as related to practitioners’ abilities to help fully integrate people with disabilities into their local communities. Using triangulation protocol designed for content analysis the study indicates the potential reasons for continued marginalization of disabled Americans.
|Commitee:||Schwoebel, Mary-Hope, Berna, Dustin|
|School:||Nova Southeastern University|
|Department:||Conflict Resolution Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- Florida|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/7(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Disability studies, Communication, Public policy|
|Keywords:||Americans with Disabilities Act, Conflict resolution, Critical disability theory, Public policy, Social justice theory|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be