Nurses are affected by societal attitudes and are not immune to implicit social judgments. This mixed-methods study examined nurses’: (1) perceptions about various types of fathers, (2) emotional reactions to the fathers, and (3) responses to questions raised by the fathers. The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) and nuclear family ideology were used as frameworks to guide this study. A sample of 167 maternal-child nurses participated in an on-line survey in which they responded to three randomized multiple segment factorial vignettes featuring five father types bringing a child to the clinic with different health conditions (e.g., a child with general health problems; a child with a chronic illness; a child with acute health symptoms). After reading descriptions of the father and child, nurses were presented with forced-choice questions about their perceptions of and emotional reactions to the fathers. They also were asked to answer questions raised by the fathers, using written responses. A series of one-way MANOVAs were conducted to examine nurses’ perceptions and emotional reactions to the fathers. Content analyses were conducted on nurses’ written responses. Although there were two significant statistical comparisons, the quantitative results suggested that nurses’ perceptions of and reactions to the fathers were not affected by the fathers’ marital and parental statuses. However, the qualitative data presented a more complicated and ambiguous picture. Nurses’ written responses were not the same for all types of fathers. Social judgments may have affected how nurses responded to certain father types.
|Commitee:||Enriquez, Maithe, Kelly, Patricia J., Proulx, Christine M.|
|School:||University of Missouri - Columbia|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/7(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Nursing, Individual & family studies, Social psychology|
|Keywords:||Fathers, Implicit bias, Maternal-child nurses, Nursing, Stereotypes|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be