As national political polarization increases in the United States, the number of studies attempting to make sense of politically conservative movements has increased. Several studies portray the contentious election of Donald Trump as a consequence of the rise of the so called “alt-right,” an amorphous movement promoting racism and anti-PC (politically correct) culture and policies. Given the online nature of the alt-right movement, some scholars and journalists have traced its rise and characteristics by examining the discourse of online spaces. Others have looked to “red” or politically conservative states to better understand the experiences of this emergent population, with researchers going to “Trump Country” to speak to largely white rural Americans in the South and Midwest. Online approaches investigate mostly younger conservatives but only through a digital medium, while ethnographic approaches capture in-person data, but only from a population that skews older and more rural.
By ethnographically focusing on conservative student groups on a liberal University of California campus, this thesis instead highlights conservative political identity formation outside typical conservative bastions. The guiding research questions for this study are the following: How do conservative students discursively navigate the liberal context in which they find themselves? What is the purpose of provocative activities such as controversial guest speaker invitations? How does conservative student discourse align with or depart from national conservative political discourse? And how is “free speech” understood among conservative students on college campuses? Three discursive strategies emerged from this study: contrastive essentialism, appropriation of liberal discourse, and memeing. These discursive strategies of conservative students are deployed together with an ideology of “free speech” as constrained by liberals. This thesis argues that, while conservative student spaces can serve as a transitional space for some students, the ideology of “free speech” as constrained renders in-group moderation difficult and, thus, attracts and empowers bigots. These bigots are able to maintain plausible deniability, utilizing the above discursive strategies to obfuscate their bigotry. Understanding the discourse of this demographic is crucial, as the current college generation is forming its political identity in one of the most turbulent times in recent history. This ethnographic engagement with such groups offers linguistic insight into bridge-building strategies, college campus climate concerns, and freedom of speech issues.
|Commitee:||Zimman, Lal, Charity Hudley, Anne|
|School:||University of California, Santa Barbara|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 81/3(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Campus climate, Conservative students, Ethnography, Political discourse, Positionality|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be