A qualitative analysis study that examined the views and opinions of non-technology professionals in the U.S. regarding government and law enforcement agencies’ demand for legislation that will allow them to snoop on online private communications of smartphone users. Governments would prefer exclusive access to encryption technologies, called a backdoor, to use in accessing messages. Technology professionals have, however, argued against a backdoor; they claim a backdoor would not only be an infringement of their privacy but that hackers could also take advantage of it. In light of this security and privacy conflict between technology professionals and government’s need to access messages in order to thwart potential terror attacks, this study presents the views and opinions of non-technology professionals in the U.S. on the ensuing encryption debate. Using qualitative descriptive design methodology, a survey of 26 participants was conducted and data was analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s six-step process of inductive thematic analysis. Results from this research study showed that non-technology professionals are willing to allow the government to infringe on their privacy if that will guarantee them safety.
|Commitee:||McAndrew, Ian, Wright, Donovan|
|School:||Capitol Technology University|
|School Location:||United States -- Maryland|
|Source:||DAI-B 81/4(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Computer science, Information Technology|
|Keywords:||End-to-end encryption, Government, Instant Messaging, National security, Privacy, WhatsApp|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be