A local government in South Florida launched a training program to improve employee engagement on climate change using best practices in adult learning and climate communication to bridge the gap between climate science and action in government operations. The purpose of this program evaluation was to determine whether that climate change development and training program for local government employees met its stated goals and objectives. This evaluation blended a component of Stufflebeam’s Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) model with Kirpatrick’s Four Levels model. To conduct the evaluation, the researcher used a mixed methods approach for analyzing both quantitative and qualitative data. The research objective was to assess an increase in climate literacy, gather perspectives on the training program, and explore application of on-the-job use from employees who have completed the training program.
CIPP results indicated that the effectiveness of the training program was not altered by whether the training was internally or externally developed. Level 1 findings showed employee reactions to the training program were generally positive. Level 2 findings revealed that although learning occurred as a result of the training program the employees’ climate literacy score did not increase significantly. Level 3 and Level 4 results showed use of the climate knowledge and tools on the job and uncovered three necessary components for furtherance of employee action: ongoing engagement, enhancing tools, and building capacity through leadership. The findings of this study are being used to inform decision makers with the intent of improving the training program.
|Commitee:||Bowser, Karen D|
|School:||Nova Southeastern University|
|Department:||Abraham S Fischler School of Education|
|School Location:||United States -- Florida|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/4(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Adult education, Climate Change|
|Keywords:||andragogy, climate literacy, employee development, local government, program evaluation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be