Sober housing is a model of communal living used in the continuum of substance abuse treatment. Sober houses are located in residential neighborhoods and utilize mutual support to assist residents in maintaining sobriety. Research demonstrates sober housing improves outcomes for those struggling with addiction, yet the research focuses almost entirely on sober housing that is regulated by private or state agencies. This study explores the nature of unregulated sober housing in Suffolk County through in-depth interviews with members of the community involved with sober housing. It studies the role it plays in the lives of community members that live in sober houses or interact with sober houses, as well as the general functioning of houses’ day-to-day operations. The sample group included residents of sober homes, professionals working in treatment centers and the criminal justice system that refer individuals to sober housing, community members that live near sober houses, parents of individuals who have lived in sober housing, and local legislators involved with sober housing legislation. Data indicated that while Suffolk County’s unregulated sober houses operate in ways similar to those identified in research on regulated houses, there are key differences that lead to a qualitatively distinct experience. The unregulated sober homes in this study often lack structure at times creating dangerous environments within the homes. Some individuals sought sober housing for themselves, their family member, or their client as a complementary support while newly sober, but many sought this type of housing only because they lacked other options. The study design relied on sampling various members across the community to build validity through data triangulation. The themes of unpredictability, lack of choice, and unmet expectations identified in the data analysis were present throughout the sample groups and emerged as consistent trends in the network of unregulated sober housing used in Suffolk County. The experience of the residents is further impacted by the neighborhoods in which the houses are located, which are often seen as less desirable and feel dangerous to the residents. Based on the data gathered in this study areas of future research would include seeking generalizability that would inform the development of models of regulating sober housing used throughout the country as well as to quantifying outcome differences between regulated and unregulated sober houses.
|Advisor:||Peabody, Carolyn G|
|Commitee:||Blau, Joel, Morgan, Richard, Reynolds, Jeffrey|
|School:||State University of New York at Stony Brook|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/4(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Public health, Social work, Behavioral Sciences|
|Keywords:||addiction, housing, Recovery home, regulated, Sober house, treatment|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be