The positive outcomes of evidence-based programs decline when interventions are implemented without fidelity (e.g., Ogden et al., 2012; Smith-Boydston, Holtzman, & Roberts, 2014; Sundell, Hansson, Löfholm, Olsson, Gustle, & Kadesjö, 2008). The measurement of implementation fidelity, the degree that current practices correspond with the original program’s prescription (Durlak & DuPre, 2008), is important for monitoring whether a program is being implemented in a manner correspondent to when it was proven to be effective. Despite abundant evidence that monitoring implementation fidelity improves outcomes, in non-research settings, fidelity measurement is often challenging to accomplish due to a variety of factors including lacking human and financial resources. Relatively little systematic attention, however, has been given to the perspectives of practitioners who are implementing evidence-based programs regarding their perception of factors that may increase the reporting of implementation fidelity data. In the current study, the author conducted a short web-survey (eight questions) and obtained the perspectives of 92 current and past practitioners of the Achievement Mentoring Program, an evidence-based, school-based intervention targeting the problematic academic behaviors of at-risk youth (Boyd-Franklin & Bry, 2019). Results included quantitative and qualitive data reflecting practitioner identified factors that facilitate/interfere with fidelity measurement (e.g., email reminders), and practitioner interest in seeing a variety of possible fidelity measurement modifications intended to increase utility for practitioners. Practitioners rated higher interest in modifications that featured student-centered data and rated lower interest in modifications featuring practitioner-focused performance data.
|Advisor:||Bry, Brenna H.|
|School:||Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology|
|Department:||Graduate School of Applied & Professional Psychology|
|School Location:||United States -- New Jersey|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/4(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational psychology, Educational leadership|
|Keywords:||Achievement mentoring program, Evidence-based programs, Implementation fidelity, Online survey, Practitioner perspectives|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be