The perceptions that individual teachers have on issues of student discipline and justice are critical factors in the relationships that exist within the classroom. However, policy decisions on student discipline are often left to administrators and school boards without the consideration of teachers’ insights on issues of behavior management. As a result, a disconnection exists between policy and practice, which affects the learning and culture of classrooms for both teachers and students. This study gives a voice to teachers as the frontline experts on student discipline and justice. Q Methodology, a research technique designed for the systematic study of subjectivity, was applied to reveal a set of distinct models of shared viewpoints held by classroom teachers. Data were collected using an anonymous, voluntary, online survey from 71 current, public school teachers in Grades 9-12 across New York State. The study found 3 shared viewpoints: (a) Q Model 1: Student Discipline and Justice as a Humanistic, Individualized Experience Centered on the Teacher-Student Relationship and Separate From Academic Progress, (b) Q Model 2: Student Discipline and Justice as a Rules-Based System, Separate From Academic Progress, That Must be Consistent and Administered Without Regard to Individual Students or Relationships and (c) Q Model 3: Student Discipline and Justice as Connected to Academics and Humanistic, and Needing Change From the Traditional Model. The study concludes that greater attention should be given to the views and role of teachers in student discipline. It recommends that more training be provided to address the internal and external conflicts teachers face in student discipline and justice. The study also concludes that a linguistic distinction should be made between “restorative justice” and “restorative practices” in the school setting.
|Advisor:||Red Owl, R H|
|Commitee:||Lester, Paula, Chowske, Rebecca|
|School:||Long Island University, C. W. Post Center|
|Department:||Interdisciplinary Educational Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/3(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Education, Educational administration|
|Keywords:||Classroom management, Exclusionary discipline, High school, Restorative justice, Restorative practice, Student discipline|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be