Accessing Liberation contends that literary study has the potential to operate as a democratic and liberatory discipline. To achieve this potential requires a new approach to the discipline’s epistemological framework that privileges the voices of both student and scholar. I herein argue that a Sociocultural Learning Theory’s Community of Practice (CoP) provides an optimal approach to reframe the discipline’s understanding of its definitions of self, meaning, and purpose in both education and society. Applying a CoP lens requires analysis of situated spaces of learning wherein negotiation for disciplinary identification occurs regularly. The literary classroom is thus a profound place where these epistemological questions and practice-linked-identifications frequently emerge and evolve. By examining Dr. Bickman’s theories and instructional approaches in his Introductory to Literary Analysis class, I hope to show how a path toward liberation might exist. His embodiment of three main practices, teaching toward liberation, writing toward liberation, and community as practice, attempts to rewrite the discipline as a democratic community. His liberatory aims, however, are not prophetic. The students of this class negotiate these practices in order to develop identifications with the discipline. Through analyzing their responses to and negotiations of the practices Marty employs, we will see how students utilize available identity resources to develop disciplinary identifications. The complex and socially negotiated processes of becoming a literary practitioner provide a more compelling approach to disciplinary epistemology because they render that approach profoundly individual and communal. Recognizing the potential of a CoP framework for investigating literary study’s epistemology thus meaningfully redirects the discipline toward intellectual community and participatory democracy.
|Commitee:||Lamos, Steven, Jurow, Susan, Brylowe, Thora, Liston, Dan|
|School:||University of Colorado at Boulder|
|School Location:||United States -- Colorado|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/3(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Language arts, Education philosophy, Educational sociology|
|Keywords:||Community, Community of practice, Democratic participation, Epistemology, Literary study, Teaching|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be