The researchers of this joint dissertation aspired to create and implement innovative instructional practices that would accelerate student learning. Both researchers believed in the importance of experimenting with structures and processes that lead to instructional impact. They were both passionate about developing an instructional model that would accelerate student learning by focusing on student transfer of skills. They sought to answer the question, Can learning be accelerated when teachers are supported and encouraged to create and implement instructional practices grounded in research? One researcher studied a practice that would potentially increase students’ ability to think critically and problem solve using 5th grade science content. The other researcher created an instructional intervention practice for underperforming students whose progress was flat and not on track to close reading gaps between their same-grade peers.
Both researchers used action research to study their respective instructional practices. One researcher used qualitative data to inform and monitor the instructional practice being studied; the other researcher used both qualitative and quantitative data. One study used critical thinking skills to aid students’ ability to learn science content. The other study used an innovative model of intervention to aid students’ ability to transfer learning from one instructional setting to another.
The researchers believed all students have the ability to accelerate learning when teachers are encouraged and given freedom to create and implement innovative teaching practices in their classrooms. Both faced obstacles while working within a defined system but found that when teachers were given the opportunity to create instructional practices that were grounded in research, student achievement was accelerated.
|Commitee:||Miller, Keith, O'Daniels, Katie|
|School:||University of Missouri - Saint Louis|
|Department:||College of Education|
|School Location:||United States -- Missouri|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/3(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Education, Science education, Elementary education|
|Keywords:||Critical thinking, Crosscutting concepts, Curriculum and instruction, Education, Professional development, Science|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be