Participation in the science workforce is low, and this can be partially attributed to low retention rates of undergraduate students who initially declare a science major. Low retention rates are further exacerbated for under-represented minority (URM) and first-generation (FG) college students pursuing science, and the existence of achievement gaps when compared with non-URM/non-first gen counterparts have been well documented. With the goal of implementing an intervention that would counteract these trends, I explored the design of, and the learning outcomes resulting from incorporating a metagenomics research curriculum for introductory undergraduate biology students majoring in science. Such interventions are purported to provide a pathway to help retain students interested in pursuing higher-education STEM degrees via increased achievement, improved attitudes, and greater self-efficacy. In this study, I measured these three general learning outcomes using a mixed-methods, quasi-experimental approach (including propensity score matching to decrease self-selection bias) to determine if these learning gains were predicted or mediated by the intervention. Results suggested achievement did not increase and attitudes do not become more favorable when incorporating the active learning modifications into the metagenomics research curriculum, specifically. However, students’ final scores (especially those of URM/FG students) were significantly improved by having more active learning incorporated into the lecture component of the treatment group. In addition, students did articulate elements of engaging in mastery experiences in their metagenomic research and so it is possible that the research curriculum helped to increase their science self-efficacy to some extent. Future studies could investigate the relative efficacy of different types of active learning modifications on achievement and attitude and also incorporate a research experience of longer duration (i.e, >9h of lab work) to determine if increased time commitment to this type of research project improves learning outcomes.
|Commitee:||Hogan, Karen M., Chan, Wendy|
|School:||University of Pennsylvania|
|Department:||Teaching, Learning and Curriculum|
|School Location:||United States -- Pennsylvania|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/2(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Science education, Educational evaluation, Educational psychology|
|Keywords:||Achievment, Attitudes towards science, Biology education, First generation students, Self-efficacy, Under-represented minority students|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be