Digital technology has become a continuous disruptor in healthcare research, education, record keeping, and communication, resulting in both opportunities and challenges. The purpose of this study was fourfold, to (a) identify the leadership practices of healthcare executives, (b) measure the attitudes of healthcare leaders toward technology, (c) explore the relation between leadership styles and attitudes toward technology, and (d) examine the relation between demographic factors (gender, age, practice type) and attitudes toward technology. Healthcare leaders in the United States were recruited from different specialties. They were asked to respond to 3 survey instruments: The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ5X), Affinity for Technology (ATI) scale, and a demographic survey. The goal of this research project was to use quantitative analysis to identify the leadership styles that may contribute to acceptance of (or resistance to) healthcare digital technology. Previous researchers had found that increased transactional, transformational, and adaptive leadership skills were associated with engagement with institutional transformation. These leadership skills also tended to be associated with belief in ethical-social responsibility and continuous talent development of all stakeholders. Thus, these particular leadership skills were expected to be relevant to attitudes toward the adoption of new technology in the workplace. Results supported this, showing that in isolation both transactional and transformational leadership were associated with increased affinity for technology.
|Commitee:||Garcia, Reyna, Cain, Ebony|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-B 81/2(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Health care management, Information Technology|
|Keywords:||Affinity for technology, Electronic health recored, Healthcare leadership, Healthcare leadership styles, Leadership styles|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be