This study proposed Edward de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats as an intervention to enhance SLD students’ reading comprehension skills. The study described the Six Thinking Hats intervention as a method that used six diverse thought processes. A narrative review further discussed how the compilation of strategies is needed to help improve reading development skills for SLD students. Additionally, the study described several theoretical frameworks for the study: construction-integration model, event index model, and the metacognitive theory.
The study used a quantitative approach to answer the research questions that focused on comparing statistical differences between an experimental group and a control group.The study utilized an experimental design that implemented Achieve 3000’s Level Set test as a pretest-posttest to measure students’ Lexile levels. Additionally, a criterion-referenced test was used as a pretest-posttest to assess the six cognitive abilities of the Six Thinking Hats for the experimental and control group.
Participants of the study were Grade 9 and Grade 10 students enrolled in Intensive Reading classes at a Florida high school.
The results of this study showed no statistically significant difference in using the Six Thinking Hats with SLD students. However, the researcher believes that this approach can be beneficial with this population of students with modifications to implementation.
|Advisor:||Hecht, Steven A.|
|School:||Nova Southeastern University|
|Department:||Abraham S Fischler School of Education|
|School Location:||United States -- Florida|
|Source:||DAI-A 81/2(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Curriculum development, Secondary education, Disability studies, Special education|
|Keywords:||Reading comprehension, Six Thinking Hats, Specific learning disabilities (SLD)|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be