Psychological assessment is regarded as a core competency in the field of psychology. In order to improve factors such as cost-effectiveness, reliability, and efficiency, clinicians and researchers incorporate the use of technology into psychological assessment through computer-based test administration, scoring, and interpretation, as well as through mobile platforms such as tablets. The purpose of the present study was to examine psychological assessment practices and trends across six categories of internship settings. The study utilized archival, questionnaire-based data from a national sample of psychology internship directors at APPIC-member programs (N = 124). The six types of internship settings examined in the present study were: university counseling centers, state/county/other public hospitals, Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, consortiums, prisons or correctional facilities, and community mental health centers. Descriptive statistics were calculated on the questionnaire responses and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine whether there were significant differences across the six groups of internship directors on selected questionnaire items. There was moderately strong endorsement of the importance of technology in psychological assessment across all six internship categories. Internship directors also reported that emphasis on, and resources for, assessment would likely remain stable or slightly increase in the future. There were no statistically significant differences between groups on the questionnaire items examined in this study. The findings suggested at least some strengthening of the importance of technology applications in assessment practices at the internship level. The findings also provide current information to academic programs and doctoral students about the continued relevance and importance of psychological assessment across a broad range of internship categories. It is clear that pre-doctoral psychology internship applicants need to continue to be prepared and trained in psychological assessment in order to be competitive in the selection process at most internship sites.
|Advisor:||Mitchell, Cary, Keatinge, Carolyn|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||DAI-B 81/2(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Psychology, Clinical psychology|
|Keywords:||Assessment, Emerging trends, Internship directors, Internship training, Psychological testing, Technology|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be