Low energy availability (LEA) can detrimentally affect an athlete’s metabolic rate, bone health, and the reproductive health of female athletes. Screening tools to identify athletes at risk for LEA are needed. However, dietary recall methods such as the RD-administered 24-hour recall are burdensome for both registered dietitians and athletes.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the concurrent validity of a web-based nutrition screening survey (NSS) meant to facilitate the efficient evaluation of food intake and nutritional risk, against a registered dietitian-administered 24-hour recall among male and female collegiate endurance runners. Participants attended a meeting with their sports dietitian, at which point an initial RD-administered 24-hour recall was collected. After a washout period of two weeks, athletes were prompted to complete the NSS. Correlations and means tests were used to compare energy and macronutrient intakes.
A total of 46 collegiate endurance runners were included in the final analysis. Based on the correlation analysis, the NSS and RD-administered recall displayed significant association for energy (r= .565, p < .001), fat (r = .535, p < .001), and protein intake (r= .414, p < .01), when outliers were excluded. There were no significant differences in average intake, for each nutrient assessed, between recall methods, indicating agreement at the group level. Bland-Altman Plot Analysis displayed proportional bias in energy intake between recall methods. This study suggests agreement between NSS and the RD-administered 24-hour recall, particularly for group data.
|Commitee:||Gray, Virginia, Arruda, Erin|
|School:||California State University, Long Beach|
|Department:||Family and Consumer Sciences|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 81/1(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Athlete, Concurrent validity, Dietary recall, Energy availability, Female athlete triad, Relative energy deficiency in sports|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be