While the literature on thermal mass and passive cooling is rich, what it means for a building to be thermally massive is not well defined or consistently applied. Most research has been conducted with mass depths far greater than would be seen in typical construction. Meanwhile, some research suggests that because the heat transfer rate at the surface is limited, the focus should be on surface area of exposed mass. Since even lightweight commercial construction typically has large surface areas of mass in the floor slabs, this research investigates how effective that mass is for passive cooling, relative to other mass depths. In all climates analyzed it was found that there was a pronounced shoulder where energy savings from passive cooling of increasing mass depths was steep until roughly 7.5 cm to 10 cm, and thereafter the energy savings diminished rapidly. When considering the embodied energy of concrete, the incremental benefit of added mass beyond a typical topping slab of 10 cm does not justify the incremental embodied energy cost from an energy standpoint alone, unless a very long embodied energy payback period was adopted.
|Advisor:||Henze, Gregor P.|
|Commitee:||Krarti, Moncef, Zuo, Wangda|
|School:||University of Colorado at Boulder|
|Department:||Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering|
|School Location:||United States -- Colorado|
|Source:||MAI 58/06M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Architectural engineering, Engineering|
|Keywords:||Mass depth, Night flush, Passive cooling, Thermal mass|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.