It has become progressively difficult for businesses to tackle unanticipated events and define the influencers that generate unintended business consequences. As such, uncertain and ambiguous situations are now the prescriptive norm for many companies. Executives are at the forefront of having to make sense of the uncertainty to seek the ideal decision pathway. The purpose of this exploratory research study was to seek what is known about learning how to develop a systems thinking mental model by exploring the perceptions and narratives of 12 global executives working in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) within complex adaptive systems (CAS) and their understanding of their thinking patterns that may have assisted in learning how to develop a systems thinking mental model to manage business ambiguity. Three research questions were developed to identify the types of experiences, perceptions, thinking patterns, and enablers—be they within the individual, organizational, or environmental context—that may have provided a strategic learning path. The research questions include: (a) What characterizes the mental models the executives hold (the distinct nature or features of their beliefs, behaviors, and principles)?; (b) What are the experiences that provide the scaffolding in developing a systems thinking mental model (experiences and events)?; and (c) What aspects of the individual, organizational, and environmental interactions enable individuals to learn how to develop a systems thinking capacity (relationships, systems, and elements)? The qualitative exploratory research study used three data collection methods: (a) semi-structured interviews, (b) focus group session, and (c) demographic questionnaire. The researcher concluded from the findings, analysis, interpretations, and synthesis that: (a) a systems thinking mental model is reflective of and responsive to different elements, situations, and influencers; (b) certain behaviors are an integral part of a systems thinking mental model; (c) informal learning experiences in ambiguous and uncertain situations may provide an ambiguous thinking learning pathway; and (d) learning through social, cultural, and operational systems is an under-utilized strategic intent.
|Commitee:||Marsick, Victoria, Pallas, Aaron, Passmore, William|
|School:||Teachers College, Columbia University|
|Department:||Organization and Leadership|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 80/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Behavioral psychology, Educational leadership, Organizational behavior|
|Keywords:||Adult learning, Ambiguity thinking strategies, Complex adaptive systems, Mental models, Organizational behavior, Systems thinking mental model|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be