The purpose of this study was to investigate how postsecondary ASL-English interpreter educators understand and apply differentiated instruction. Specifically, to gather the perspectives of educators on their use of, and the need for, differentiated instruction with Deaf-parented interpreting students. The review of literature focused on closely-related and foundational themes as no literature could be identified on differentiated instruction with Deaf-parented interpreting students in interpreter education. The review included literature on Deaf-parented individuals, Deaf-parented interpreters, interpreting students, heritage language users and learners, and the use of differentiated instruction. A basic qualitative research design was used and a purposive, criterion-based sampling resulted in 20 interpreter educator participants. The research question for the study was What are postsecondary ASL-English interpreter educators’ experiences differentiating instruction for Deaf-parented interpreting students? Two subquestions focused on differentiating for linguistic and cultural readiness and experience. Data analysis utilized three concurrent flows of activity: data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. Themes were identified related to teaching practices and perceptions of Deaf-parented interpreting students. The themes did not clearly answer all of the research questions. The themes indicated that educators are not using differentiated instruction, but some elements described fit within differentiated instructional approaches. Also indicated are perceptions about the needs for differentiation. Deaf-parented-interpreting students were perceived as having advantages, disadvantages, and expectations that differ from their non-Deaf-parented peers. Implications include providing a foundation from which to continue exploring and testing perceptions as well as becoming aware of and considering teaching options in the ASL-English interpreting classroom. Suggestions for future research are also provided and recommended in order to continue expanding the information available on this topic.
|Commitee:||Onderdonk, James, Patrie, Carol J.|
|School Location:||United States -- Minnesota|
|Source:||DAI-A 80/09(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Interpreters, Qualitative research, Teaching methods|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be