Increased nutrient availability has been widely linked to the success of invasive plants, however a general mechanism explaining these observations is lacking. Stoichiometric homeostasis (H), which is the regulation of internal nutrient concentrations, has been used to explain changes in plant community diversity under alterations in nutrient availability. One hypothesis holds that plants with high regulation (larger H) decrease in abundance in nutrient enriched conditions but are stable in nutrient deficient and drought conditions, likely due to extensive root systems. Additionally, plants with low regulation (lower H) increase in abundance under nutrient enriched conditions but are sensitive to drought conditions. I tested the hypotheses that H would be higher in native grasses than in invasive grasses, that H would be modulated by environmental conditions, and that differences in H would be associated with differences in growth and biomass allocation. I calculated H and measured plant growth and growth traits in two native ( Pascopyrum smithii and Elymus canadensis) and two invasive (Bromus inermis and Agropyron cristatum ) grasses grown in two experiments. Both experiments contained a range of N:P fertilizer supply concentrations and the first experiment contained a two-level drought treatment while the second experiment contained a two-level mycorrhizal inoculation treatment.
In the first experiment, I found support for the hypothesis that H is higher in native than invasive plants, that environmental conditions (i.e. water availability) affect the value of H, and that differences in H were associated with differences in growth. In the second experiment, there was no successful mycorrhizal inoculation, resulting in no differences in H between mycorrhizal treatment groups. There were significant differences in total growth between the second experiment native and invasive grasses, despite there being no significant differences in H. Differences in H values between control-treated grasses in the two experiments may be due to differences in greenhouse temperature and light conditions. These results show first, significant differences exist in H between invasive and native grasses, with invasive grasses expressing lower values of H, second, environmental conditions effect the expression of H, and third, that differences in the expression of H are matched by differences in growth.
|Advisor:||Leffler, Alan J.|
|Commitee:||Perkins, Lora B., Xu, Lan|
|School:||South Dakota State University|
|Department:||Natural Resource Management|
|School Location:||United States -- South Dakota|
|Source:||MAI 58/05M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Biology, Botany, Ecology|
|Keywords:||Drought, Eutrophication, Invasive species, Mycorrhizae, Plant-nutrient relationships, Stoichiometric homeostasis|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be