Risk on a project or program is typically evaluated in terms of the triple constraint: scope, time, and cost. The Monte Carlo method (Metropolis & Ulam, 1949) is a widely accepted risk analysis technique and is deemed to be an effective way of analyzing the uncertainty associated with cost and schedule risks. More systems engineers and risk managers are taking advantage of this risk analysis technique to perform independent risk assessments on either cost or schedule; however, the analysis of technical risk using a statistical approach has not been formulated to a significant degree in the literature.
This research study will explore the use of a statistical versus a deterministic approach to independently assess the risks associated with technical performance. The methodology discussed transforms a deterministic risk assessment model into a statistical model. Expert judgment is used within a Bayesian framework to develop baseline expected values for technical performance. Technical Performance Measurement (TPM), Monte Carlo simulation, and @Risk software are used to calculate a system level Technical Risk Index Distribution (TRID). The TRID framework defines distribution ranges for each TPM and formulates risk index distributions. Actual data from a DoD TPM implementation project is used to validate the TRID framework. The proposed statistical model is verified on a hypothetical system where quantifiable TPMs have been identified that meet the criterion in the model proposed.
Keywords. Monte Carlo simulation, TPMs, technical performance measures, technical risk, technical performance risk, Monte Carlo risk analysis, sensitivity analysis, technical risk analysis, program management, risk management, project management, risk analysis, risk, quantitative risk analysis, expert judgment, Bayes Theorem, Bayesian methods, expert opinion.
|Advisor:||Mazzuchi, Thomas A., Sarkani, Shahram|
|Commitee:||Allario, Frank, Murphree, Edward L., Podolsky, Michael J.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Engineering Mgt and Systems Engineering|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-B 71/04, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Statistics, Systems science, Operations research|
|Keywords:||Bayesian methods, Expert judgment, Monte Carlo simulation, Risk analysis, Technical performance measurement, Technical risk|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be