Since 2009, the United States has experienced another wave of hospital mergers. Consequently, health systems are getting larger and increasing their market concentration. How patients benefit from hospital consolidation remains an open issue for policy-makers, economists, health care executives, community leaders, politicians, government agencies, and others. One measure of healthcare consolidation’s impact, and its potential benefit/detriment, is how mergers affect patient experience, which, since 2007, has been measured by the standardized HCAHPS instrument.
Hundreds of studies conducted over the past 50 years have found mergers trigger an internal, socially-disruptive effect in the first 12 to 24 months following the event as the two merging organizations attempt to blend cultures, restructure job assignments, implement merger-related efficiencies, and achieve the overall strategic goals that brought about the merger. Consequently, organizational performance may decline in the short-term as the merger-related changes and accompanying upheaval move through the organization and get resolved.
Many researchers have evaluated the impact of hospital mergers on quality, safety, access, costs, pricing, and profits. However, no research study has examined the relationship between hospital mergers and patient satisfaction or patient experience. This research attempted to fill that gap with a quasi-experimental design using an interrupted time-series study. Cross-sectional, aggregate mean values of four different HCAHPS ratings (overall, physician communication, nurse communication, and staff responsiveness) of 99 merged/acquired hospitals were compared to that of 99 matched hospitals over a six-year time period (three year prior to the merger and three years post-merger). Fixed effects difference-in-differences testing was applied to evaluate and compare the post-merger rate of change in HCAHPS ratings between the two hospital groups.
This study revealed a negative relationship between some elements of a hospital’s HCAHPS performance and merger status (i.e., completed a merger in the last 12 to 24 months or not). Specifically, a negative relationship was found between the merger group and two of the four HCAHPS domains (overall and nurse communications). Furthermore, a significant difference was found among the merged/acquired hospitals with respect to merger type. Hospitals that were acquired performed worse than hospitals that were part of a merger-of-equals. With the exception of the nurse domain, negative differences were resolved three years after the event.
Findings from this study will guide and inform hospital administrators, health system boards, state and federal government regulations and policies, and others across a wide spectrum of healthcare industry stakeholders.
|Commitee:||Carroll, Nate, Szychowski, Jeff, Weech-Maldonado, Robert|
|School:||The University of Alabama at Birmingham|
|School Location:||United States -- Alabama|
|Source:||DAI-B 80/07(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Health care management|
|Keywords:||HCAHPS, Hospital acquisition, Hospital consolidation, Hospital merger, Merger-related disruption, Patient experience|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be