This study investigated the contributions of segments (consonants vs. vowels) to speech intelligibility in Arabic and English. In these two languages, consonants and vowels play crucially different grammatical roles. Arabic is a nonconcatenative language that primarily assigns lexical information to consonants and morphosyntactic information to vowels, while English is a concatenative language that does not assign distinct roles to either class of segments. On this basis, we hypothesized that consonants and vowels would play very different roles in the intelligibility of the two languages. Five laboratory experiments were conducted, three on Arabic and two on English. Participants listened to words and sentences in which either all consonants or all vowels were replaced with silence and were asked to indicate what they heard. Unlike previous studies, all stimuli were carefully controlled for ratio of consonants to vowels. Results showed that in Arabic, consonants made a greater contribution than vowels to speech intelligibility, both in isolated words and in complete sentences. Furthermore, in consonant-only conditions, stimuli containing more consonants were more intelligible than those containing more vowels, displaying a clear effect of segmental ratio. In English, by contrast, the consonants and vowels made roughly equivalent contributions to speech intelligibility, and segmental ratio played a negligible role. These two disparate findings suggest that segmental contributions are crucially modulated by language-specific factors. That is, the different contributions of consonants and vowels to speech intelligibility are not solely determined by their distinct acoustic cues, but also by the grammatical role they play.
|Commitee:||Eckman, Fred, Ouali, Hamid, Park, Hanyong|
|School:||The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee|
|School Location:||United States -- Wisconsin|
|Source:||DAI-A 80/05(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Acoustics vs. morphology, Arabic vs. English, Nonconcatenative vs. concatenative, Segmental contributions, Speech intelligibility, Vowels vs. consonants|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be