In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of July 22nd, 2011 on government buildings in Oslo and a summer camp on Utøya Island, the prime minister’s office tasked a special commission with investigating three questions in regards to the incidents: What happened 22/7/11? Why did it happen? How could we as a society let it happen?
The report concluded months later, with a devastating criticism of the police and their efforts. Largely, the counter measures brought into play by the police, on local, regional, and national levels, were deemed inadequate and sub par to what should be expected. The report held leadership and culture in the police organization to be chiefly explanatory for their failures.
In the weeks and months to follow, the report’s findings were debated and a variety of explanations were discussed.
This paper sets out to apply Bicchieri’s theories on social norms to the documented narratives of the police’s behavior, to suggest that the Norwegian social norm of equality hindered adequate action on the part of the police again and again. The findings demonstrate significant prevalence of the norm in the Norwegian police, when considering their behaviors and operations on the day in question. This paper also argues for a correlation between preference for conforming to the norm and specific behavioral patterns, thus suggesting plausible explanatory properties as to the lack of leadership, absence of initiative, and strong, group thinking patterns criticized by the commission.
Further, this thesis explores improvisation as a means to transform social norms, and examines the deviating examples - the outliers in the 22/7 case - to test the method’s applicability and feasibility as explanatory element.
|School:||The American University of Paris (France)|
|Source:||MAI 58/03M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||European Studies, Sociology|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be