In its extremes, deaccessioning—the practice of removing an object from a collection, can be a useful tool for pruning a collection, or in the cases covered by the media, a serious cause for ethical and legal concern. These latter instances cover a wide range of issues, which this thesis aims to explore to ultimately answer: Who is capable of enforcing deaccessioning when it goes awry, what are the consequences to be paid, and who pays them? The analysis herein uses as case studies two landmark deaccessioning campaigns of The Metropolitan Museum of Art in 1972 and the Rose Art Museum of Brandeis University in 1992, in addition to museum policy literature, analysis of the legal fiduciary structures of museums, periodicals, and industry blogs to lend a greater context. This thesis will demonstrate that central to the unabating nature of the deluge of deaccessions-by-sale is the lack of a clearly articulated stance of the legal system on these matters, inefficacy of ethical guidelines, and the prevailing trend of reducing the value of the art object into a financial asset by those the public entrusts with its safekeeping. Ultimately, I argue that the only efficient solution to regulate deaccessioning-by-sale is to increase legal regulations restricting the process, and increasing transparency on the part of museums.
|Commitee:||Proctor-Tiffany, Mariah, Simms, Matthew|
|School:||California State University, Long Beach|
|School Location:||United States -- California|
|Source:||MAI 58/02M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Ethics, Law, Museum studies|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be