Using Monte Carlo methods, we revisit the normative economic model proposed by economist Tito Cordella to understand the tensions between maximizing private financing and optimizing financing for development. To focus on his comments about the new World Bank Group Cascade Approach’s proposed sequence of interventions, we check the robustness of his main conclusions, particularly his scenarios where subsidies should be considered before reforms to maximize social welfare gains from having the private sector finance international development projects.
More generally, Cordella claims that the cascade approach might not be the optimal sequence of interventions to maximize a project’s social welfare impact because the efficiency of reforms in capturing externalities is a ‘hidden’ societal cost. Multiple scenarios exist where it would be better to first subsidize the private sector before enacting inefficient reforms that waste large portions of a project’s positive externalities to make them profitable enough to receive private sector financing.
His conclusions use a normative economic model that depends on strict independent and uniform distributional assumptions for project characteristics, these results when replicated using Monte Carlo method simulations prove robust when considering (1) non-independent distributions for project characteristics, (2) several different distribution assumptions for project characteristics, and even (3) real-world financial and economic returns data for both public and private sector World Bank Group projects.
|Advisor:||Apanasovich, Tatiyana V., Cordella, Tito|
|Commitee:||Barut, Ahmet Emre|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||MAI 58/01M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Statistics, Economics, Public policy|
|Keywords:||Cost-benefit analysis, G20 Hamburg Action Plan, International development, Mobilizing and catalyzing private capital, Multilateral development banks, World Bank Group|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be