Metal production in the United States contributes significantly to the national and global economies due to resource demands. As mineral reserves are becoming scarce, demand has driven mining companies to operate at increasing depths underground. Along with this, production has continued to increase year after year, as lower grade ores are excavated economically. However, the increased mining depths and increased production have resulted in enlarged heat loads in the underground mine environment. Increased heat loads can result in temperatures, which are too high for mine workers to safely work. This may cause heat related illness, injuries or even death. Mine operators must pursue heat reduction strategies in order to maintain safe temperatures to protect mine workers.
There are a number of heat mitigation methods and strategies which mine operators can implement. The most common means is through the use of ventilation to provide cool air volumes to reduce the heat load and dilute the contaminants generated in the production workings below their threshold limit values (TLV). This can be done by increasing the fresh air volumes through surface accesses such as shafts, raises, adits, ramps, or other mine entrances. When ventilation alone cannot provide acceptable climatic conditions in the production workings and throughout the mine, artificial cooling methods need to be used. These methods can be very effective, however, they require large capital investments, continuous maintenance, and additional operating costs. This includes central cooling, spot cooling, and micro-climate cooling systems. Though reducing the heat load is effective, another strategy is to reduce the source of the heat generation. One such source is the heat generated by diesel engine equipment fleet. This can be decreased by switching to a battery/electric engine equipment fleet. All of these strategies can be compared based off their heat reduction, temperatures, and operating costs. This study does exactly this by using an underground metal mine’s ventilation system to compare various scenarios, and identify the most effective cooling method or system that can be used in deep and hot US mines.
|Advisor:||Kocsis, Karoly C.|
|Commitee:||Abbasi, Behrooz, Mohanty, Manoj, Watters, Robert|
|School:||University of Nevada, Reno|
|School Location:||United States -- Nevada|
|Source:||MAI 58/01M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Artificial cooling, Battery powered equipment, Heat load, Surface bulk air cooling, Ventilation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be