This study examined the perceived effects of high-stakes testing and accountability policies on high- and low-poverty middle schools in one school district in the state of Maryland. A qualitative approach, consisting primarily of teacher and principal interviews, was used to examine the effects of the Maryland School Assessment in four areas: curriculum, instructional methods, availability of instructional supports, and job satisfaction. The study was conducted in three high-poverty and three low-poverty schools in a large, generally low-poverty school district with a considerable number of high-poverty schools. Educators in both sets of schools perceived test-based accountability to be a major influence in the areas of curriculum and instructional methods. Educators in general reported an increase in emphasis on tested subjects, the use of fewer student-directed teaching methods, and more time spent on test-taking strategies. Educators also reported that several factors, apart from test-based accountability, also influenced their instructional methods. These included, most notably, school scheduling and class size. Other changes reported in both high- and low-poverty schools included greater consistency in instruction, increased use of student assessment data, more attention devoted to low-performing students, the reallocation of staffing resources within schools from nontested to tested subjects, and increased job-related pressure. The perceptions of educators in high- and low-poverty schools were different in several respects, with the former reporting, most notably, that the degree to which specific subjects were emphasized varied from year to year based on test performance, that expectations for student performance were unreasonable, and that fewer opportunities for advanced learning were available to high-performing students. Educators in high-poverty schools also reported declines in morale; however, very few educators suggested that test-based accountability was a factor in determining their future career plans.
|Advisor:||Rotberg, Iris C.|
|Commitee:||Berkowitz, Susan, Nakib, Yas|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Educational Administration and Policy Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 71/04, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational tests & measurements, Middle School education, Education Policy|
|Keywords:||Accountability, Availability of instructional supports, Curriculum and instructional methods, High-stakes testing, Job satisfaction, Maryland, Middle schools, Poverty, Testing and accountability|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be