One pathway for a new device to gain access to the marketplace requires demonstration that it is equivalent to, or substantially better than, a legally marketed device. To evaluate the equivalence of a medical imaging device, we propose measuring the intra- or inter-reader agreement in a reader study, where the clinicians (readers) make diagnoses on the medical images (cases) using both the new and old imaging devices. Such an endpoint, as well as its variance estimate, enable us to make a statistical inference on the equivalence of two devices. A method for multiple-reader multiple-case agreement analysis was presented in Gallas et al. (2016) for fully-crossed study designs, where every reader reads every case. In practice, having every reader read every case may be impossible when readers have a limited amount of time to participate in the study. One alternative study design is the split-plot study design, where both the readers and the cases are partitioned into a fixed number of groups, and each group of readers reads its own group of cases. In this thesis, we adapt the multiple-reader multiple-case agreement analysis method in Gallas et al. (2016) to analyze split-plot study designs, and propose a new variance estimator based on splitting the analysis across the groups. In each split sub-study, we compute an estimate, and then combine these estimates to obtain the final estimate for the full study. Our numerical studies show that the "split-analysis" variance estimator provides more accurate estimation of the variance of concordance measurements than the full-study-based method for unbalanced split-plot study designs.
|Advisor:||Wang, Huixia Judy, Gallas, Brandon D.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||MAI 57/06M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Statistics, Medical imaging|
|Keywords:||Agreement analysis, Concordance, Multi-reader multi-case study, U-statistic, Variance estimation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be