Maturing new technologies through the systems engineering lifecycle has been a perpetual issue for the U.S. systems engineering community. Although there are many reasons why technologies fail to mature, this study examines the perceptions of why technologies succeed. To examine these perceptions, this study proposes to extend an established marketing tool framework, the Technology Readiness Index (TRI), into the systems engineering space. The TRI was originally developed to understand customers’ and employees’ interactions with technology and their propensity to embrace cutting-edge technology, which is considered as a person’s technology readiness. This study uses the TRI framework to survey the perceptions of the U.S. systems engineering community of successful technology maturation traits, and relate these perceptions to the systems engineering lifecycle. This survey framework, in combination with the Mann-Whitney U test method for determining statistical differences in non-parametric data, results in multiple common technology maturation perceptions throughout the systems engineering lifecycle, with cross-cutting themes of communicating regularly with interested parties, reducing implementation risk, and having a positive business case to sell to stakeholders. Moreover, it shows differences in the perceptions of the U.S. systems engineering community in relation to these common perceptions, as well as specific technology transition traits.
|Advisor:||Islam, Muhammad F.|
|Commitee:||Etemadi, Amirhossein, Malalla, Ebrahim, Shifler, David A.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-B 79/08(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Systems engineering, Technology maturation, Technology readiness, Technology transition|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be