This study focuses on the role of the body as a central factor in subverting gender norms. Hypothesizing a model based in Judith Butler’s work on sex and gender performance that places the body in an integral position as mediator of discourse and creator of identity, I posit that bodily disruptions occur when the body re-cites patriarchal discursive assumptions of gender in such a way as to emphasize the constructedness of gender identity, and in turn, of discourse itself. By looking at the body as a type of subversive space, I uncover the hidden methods texts use to undercut the gender norms of the mid-1960s. Using Margaret Atwood’s first published novel The Edible Woman, I apply this theory to analyze the ways in which the body is able to recite discourse to question the stability of gender identity. I explore the ways the text plays with the construction of gender through the use of bodies, such as through performance. The role of ironic language (in highlighting this construction) is also discussed, as are the different uses of irony among characters, and irony as a type of bodily performance. I discuss the subversive qualities of protagonist Marian’s eating disorder, abjection of food, and mimesis in detail as they relate to the character’s (unacknowledged) questioning of gender norms. I stress the importance of the disruptive body to Marian’s eating disorder, especially since previous Atwood scholarship often speaks of her disease as either psychosomatic or conscious rebellion. The body is clearly the central factor in this novel, re-citing discourse and questioning gender identity. While the character’s bodies can be interpreted as questioning gender norms, the characters are either unaware of it or are unable to express what their bodies are doing. Finally, I conclude with a discussion of the role of language in the text, how it poses a complication to bodily rupture (as language is capable of lying or manipulation), and how the body is able to step outside of language. Since the body exists within but also prior to discourse, the body is unable to be completely expressed through language, and thus leaves an excess of itself. This excess, symbolized by the mess in Marian’s apartment, testifies to the lasting force of bodily subversion. Because it is not limited by language, the body has a freedom to express itself in other ways (as demonstrated by its excess) and thus provides a more successful disrupting force.
|School:||Bowling Green State University|
|Department:||English and Literature|
|School Location:||United States -- Ohio|
|Source:||MAI 57/05M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Canadian literature, Womens studies, Gender studies|
|Keywords:||Atwood, Margaret, Bodies, Butler, Judith, Discourse, Edible woman, Subversion|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be