Framed against educational policies that conceptualize teacher understanding as best advanced by quantitative measures and standardization, this study explores the lived experiences of three reflective teachers to inquire how practicing teachers understand their students’ learning. This phenomenological study asks: How do three secondary school English teachers use reflection to understand their students’ learning? This guiding question is supported by three subsidiary questions: 1) How do these teachers describe their students’ learning? 2) How do these teachers describe their understanding of students’ learning? 3) How do teachers perceive reflection has shaped their understanding of students’ learning?
This study is theoretically situated in Gadamer’s theory of hermeneutic as it examines the ways in which the teachers interpret their students’ learning. Data collection followed Seidman’s (2013) phenomenological interview protocol as well as Nakkula and Ravitch’s (1998) memoing process. Data analysis began with an application of The Listening Guide method (Gilligan, Spenser, Weinberg, & Bertsch, 2003) and then proceeded to thematic analysis (Bernarnd & Ryan, 2010). The data analysis process surfaced seven themes related to teachers’ understanding of student learning as well as a rich context for understanding those themes. These themes support the theoretical framework described in Gadamer’s hermeneutics. They also reveal the complexity of student learning and the complexity of analysis and interpretation involved in understanding this phenomenon.
|Commitee:||Casemore, Brian, Green, Colin|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Curriculum & Instruction|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 79/08(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Language arts, Teacher education, Secondary education|
|Keywords:||Gadamer, Hermeneutics, Listening Guide method, Reflection, Student learning, Teacher understanding|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be