The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact and response to the findings of the Quality Review, in twelve selected schools in NYC, as it related to Quality Indicator 3.4. It focused on the challenges these principals had to contend with to move from an Underdeveloped, Developing, or Proficient rating to a Well Developed rating in Quality Indicator 3.4. It focused on the strategies these principals used to change the organizational culture of the school community in preparation for the next Quality Review. Finally, it will attempt to determine if elements of the primary embedding mechanisms identified by Edgar H. Schein, were prevalent in the strategies principals used to change the culture of their organizations and therefore make improvements in their Quality Review proficiency ratings.
The participants in this study included twelve principals which encompassed elementary, junior high, and high school. Individuals selected to be part of a target population of principals were able to acquire a Well Developed rating in Quality Indicator 3.4 after receiving an Underdeveloped, Developing, or Proficient on the preceding QR between the years of 2011–2016. Data was collected using the interview questions developed by the researcher, and triangulated with data from the School Quality Review (SQR), and the NYC Quality Review reports for each of the participating schools. The findings in this study revealed that external evaluation tools liken to the NYC QR have an impact on school climate and can be used as a lever for change in the organizational culture of a school community. It also revealed that Schein’s primary embedding mechanisms are applicable in the school setting.
|Advisor:||Reidy, Robert J., Jr.|
|Commitee:||Ianniello, Peter, Steele, Jerome D.|
|School:||Sage Graduate School|
|School Location:||United States -- New York|
|Source:||DAI-A 79/08(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Educational leadership, Educational administration, Organizational behavior|
|Keywords:||Organizational culture, Quality Indicator 3.4, Quality Review, Schein's primary embedding mechanisms|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be