A product is recalled when it is deemed to pose a public safety hazard. As systems become more complex, identifying what factors influence recalls becomes increasingly important for engineering managers and systems engineers. With this in mind, this research endeavor highlights a novel safety framework that assists engineering teams in identifying recall risk factors early in the systems engineering process. The framework is applicable to complex systems, which usually have several stakeholders with requirements, and their needs are to be satisficed. Existing system engineering tools such as Failure Mode and Effects Analysis and Fault-tree Analysis are incorporated to identify risks. Five sequential activity phases are integral to the framework: Stakeholder Identification, Data Acquisition, Statistical Analysis, Safety Analysis, and Risk Review. The framework is especially useful in identifying and evaluating factors that could be associated with recalls prior to the next system design revision. For example, the framework can be applied by the engineering team during the redesign phase of a vehicle model (e.g. 2018 Toyota Camry), using historical data from the previous generation (e.g. 2011 Toyota Camry). Validation of the recall mitigation framework is highlighted through a case study involving the engineering of a new vehicle model in the automotive industry. Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) of complex systems like cars issue recalls whenever the vehicle is perceived to have defects impacting public safety, whether due to airbag issues or excessive emissions. For over four years (2010–2013), the influence of recall factors for each automaker was analyzed. An additional, more qualitative, case study was performed of Lithium-Ion battery recalls, based on learnings from Sony’s woes in 2006. These case studies further validate the framework. Utilizing the framework within a new project environment can greatly assist engineering managers and their teams in identifying recall risk factors early in the systems engineering lifecycle.
|Advisor:||Blackburn, Timothy D., Sarkani, Shahram|
|Commitee:||Etemadi, Amir H., Garstenauer, Andreas, Mazzuchi, Thomas A.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-B 79/08(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Engineering, Systems science|
|Keywords:||Automotive quality, Complex systems, Li-Ion battery, Recalls, Stakeholders, Warranty|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be