My dissertation lies at the intersection of computer science and the decision sciences. With psychology and sociology, I’m interested in models where social and cognitive factors influence human decisions, especially in social dilemmas and out-of-equilibrium dynamics such as learning and adaptation. With microeconomics and game theory, I realize that modeling human behavior as an attempt to maximize individual well-being is useful. I combine theoretical insights from the decision sciences with computational methods to understand and predict human behavior.
My work is distinct from most decision science research in two respects: (1) I emphasize prediction, and (2) I am not attempting to make simple economic decision models better describe behavior. First, the majority of economic and behavioral science research focuses on either describing in-sample phenomena or testing theories that posit causal relationships among theoretical constructs [1, 2]. The primary difference between prediction and causality research approaches derives from the unit of interest – causal explanation is directly concerned with theoretical population-level constructs, while prediction is directly concerned with sampled data. My research demonstrates that data-driven models with a prediction focus can be strategically designed and implemented to inform theory. As for the second point of divergence, I am not part of what constitutes most of the field of behavioral economics: the “subjective expected utility repair program” . This is the active line of research adding psychological parameters to the subjective expected utility model  to allow it to better fit behavioral data .
My overarching modeling goal for my dissertation is to maximize generalization – some function of data and knowledge – from one sample, with its observations drawn independently from the distribution D, to another sample drawn independently from D,2 while also obtaining interpretable insights from the models. The processes of collecting relevant data and generating features from the raw data impart substantive knowledge into predictive models (and the model representation and optimization algorithms applied to those features contain methodological knowledge). I combine this knowledge with the data to train predictive models to deliver generalizability, and then investigate the implications of those models with simulations systematically exploring parameter spaces. The exploration of parameter space provides insights about the relationships between key variables.
|Advisor:||Gilligan, Jonathan M.|
|Commitee:||Abkowitz, Mark D., Hornberger, George M., Vorobeychik, Yevgeniy|
|Department:||Integrated Computational Decision Science|
|School Location:||United States -- Tennessee|
|Source:||DAI-B 79/05(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Information Technology, Economics, Computer science|
|Keywords:||Cooperation, Game theory, Simulation|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be