The goal of this research was to identify and correct flaws in the Disability Determination Services at the initial claims stage of review. The research included examining previous literature, comparing the Texas Disability Determination Services mission statement the agencies performance measures, examining the Supreme Court case Mathews v. Eldridge and applying the Mathews v. Eldridge three-part balance test to a recent rejected claim from Texas Disability Determination Services.
|School:||American Military University|
|School Location:||United States -- West Virginia|
|Source:||MAI 57/01M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Law, Social work, Political science|
|Keywords:||Administrative Law, Case Study, Political Science, Quality of Life, Social Security Disability, Texas DDS|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be