This work presents a comprehensive experimental study of users’ perceived security and frequency of use of a smartphone-based mobile payment app. Previous research work relied primarily on surveys to collect data of potential users’ expectations of and attitude towards mobile payment. It remained sketchy how users would react using a real app, and how mobile payment would be used in comparison with existing payment methods such as cash and payment cards. The design of the experiments was based on a generalizable taxonomy built for the purpose of use within the field of usable security. Five sets of experiments were conducted in which participants took part in a shopping experience. The security method used with the mobile payment app was varied (no security, PIN, fingerprint recognition) and "attacks" were simulated on the payment methods. Furthermore, important personality traits were determined by established questionnaires. The results of the experiments revealed relevant factors, which show an impact on perceived security and usage. It could be shown to what extent personality traits and other external factors are related to perceived security and usage. Additionally, perceived security and usage were modeled and two classificators were developed to distinguish between convenient and inconvenient security methods (for usage), and apps with and without security methods (for perceived security). Finally, the models were incorporated as a proof-of-concept into the tool MeMo for the simulation of user behavior. Overall, it was shown that personality traits have a moderate effect on perceived security and usage. Price, shopping environment, and attacks are also influential. Different security methods showed significant differences in evaluation and use of the app.
|School:||Technische Universitaet Berlin (Germany)|
|Source:||DAI-C 81/1(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be