Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

The divergence of the economic fortunes of Hindus and Muslims in British India: A comparative institutional analysis
by Singh, Anantdeep, Ph.D., University of Southern California, 2008, 213; 3341907
Abstract (Summary)

This work suggests that the underdevelopment of South Asia’s Muslims vis-à-vis Hindus of the region stems from differences in the commercial institutions and inheritance laws of the two communities. First, the Hindu joint family was a durable institution that could branch out into long term business ventures. Islamic partnerships were not durable and could not carry into long term business ventures. Because of this difference, Hindus enjoyed a competitive advantage in the adoption of joint stock companies. Second, whereas Hindu inheritance law tended to accumulate capital over time, Islamic inheritance law tended to fragment capital over time. This gave Hindus more access to capital vis-à-vis Muslims in India’s capital-scarce economy. As a consequence, India’s Hindus came to dominate South Asia’s industry, marginalizing its Muslims.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Kuran, Timur
Commitee: Klerman, Daniel, Nugent, Jeffrey
School: University of Southern California
Department: Political Economy and Public Policy
School Location: United States -- California
Source: DAI-A 70/01, Dissertation Abstracts International
Subjects: Economics, South Asian Studies
Keywords: Hindu, India, Inheritance law, Islam, Islamic institutions, Joint family
Publication Number: 3341907
ISBN: 978-0-549-98230-2
Copyright © 2020 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy