In his 1961 farewell address to the nation, President Dwight D. Eisenhower explained how a “technological revolution during recent decades” was “largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture.” As a result, this dissertation considers how and why post-WWII industrial research became, according to Eisenhower, “more formalized, complex, and costly.” The origins and characteristics of a paradigm shift in how American corporations conducted research are identified by comparing changes in R&D at the B.F. Goodrich Company from 1941 through 1960 to similar developments at the 200 largest U.S. industrial manufacturers in 1948.
For large-scale firms, WWII mobilization escalated into a crisis when federal attempts to organize industry for wartime and postwar production threatened to break down barriers to entry and increase competition in the marketplace. As a participant in the government’s synthetic rubber program, B.F. Goodrich was required to share patents and technical expertise with federal agencies and other rubber, oil, and chemical companies. Fearing that these exchanges might undermine its competitive advantages in rubber manufacturing, Goodrich reorganized its R&D departments and constructed a new research center by 1948 as part of its strategic transformation from an industrial corporation that refined and fabricated one particular raw material (rubber) to a research company with diverse product lines in rubber goods and chemically related sectors.
Likewise, an analysis of the 200 largest U.S. industrial manufacturers in 1948 reveals that from 1941 through 1960, nearly every one of these firms constructed new research facilities, hired armies of scientists and technicians, and implemented some type of product diversification strategy in order to hedge against the uncertainties of an evolving postwar political economy. These research facilities were themselves small-scale, brick-and-mortar “military-industrial complexes” where the technical and functional capabilities of large corporations were enhanced by managers and scientists who not only secured funding in the form of government contracts, but also coordinated the activities of corporate and university laboratories to achieve technological innovation.
|Advisor:||Becker, William H.|
|Commitee:||Berkowitz, Edward D., Long, C. Thomas, McClenahan, Jr., William M., Stott, Richard B.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 78/12(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||American history, Economic history, Organization Theory|
|Keywords:||B.f. goodrich company, Industrial research, Military-industrial complex, Synthetic rubber program, Technological innovation, World war ii mobilization|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be