Greenleaf (1977) proposed that communication is a crucial component of servant leadership. He suggested that the leader's communicative patterns comprised of listening and persuasion influence followers to attribute the servant quality to the leader. Following Greenleaf (1977), literature has supported both the general notion that communication is an important topic for servant leadership research and the specific consideration that listening and persuasion are paramount to servant leadership. Despite literature support for the importance of communication to servant leadership, no empirical studies have focused on servant leaders' communicative patterns or explained the relationship between communicative patterns and servant-leadership attribution. Thus, following Lynham's (2002) general method of theory building, the present research sought to infer an answer to the research question: Is there a relationship between leaders' communicative patterns and servant-leadership attribution by followers? A population of 243 individuals including (a) top leadership, (b) management, (c) workforce, and (d) students at a Midwestern, Christian, liberal-arts university were invited to self-select into a cross-sectional survey. Data were collected utilizing an online instrument comprised of (a) the Servant Leadership Assessment Instrument (Dennis, 2004), (b) the Servant Leadership Inventory (Longbotham, 2007), and (c) the Relational Message Scale (Burgoon & Hale, 1987). Hypotheses predicted a positive relationship between the independent variables, listening and persuasion, and an attribution to leaders by subordinates of the dependent variables: (a) love, (b) humility, (c) vision, (d) trust, and (e) empowerment. Demographic data were also collected including (a) gender, (b) age, (c) education level, (d) organizational level, and (e) tenure. Multiple regression analysis indicated statistically significant support for all research hypotheses with no demographic covariates contributing significantly to the regression models. Results from ANOVA suggested some significant differences for (a) age, (b) organizational level, and (c) educational level but no significant differences for gender or tenure. Findings suggest that future servant leadership research should include communication as a primary topic and should develop a communication-based servant leadership instrument.
|School Location:||United States -- Virginia|
|Source:||DAI-A 69/04, Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Management, Communication, Occupational psychology|
|Keywords:||Attribution, Communicative patterns, Empowerment, Humility, Leadership, Listening, Love, Persuasion, Servant leadership, Trust, Vision|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be