Addiction treatments have a very low rate of successful recovery in the U.S., consequently, treatment recidivism and substance abuse death are imminent. The purpose of this paper was to determine the relationship between marginalization and what type of treatment an individual received. This paper used a binary logistic regression to determine whether being a marginalized increases likelihood of receiving the lesser form of addiction treatment. The independent variable was split into 11 marginalization/privilege variables. The hypothesis for this paper were split into three models: 1) marginalization predicts an increase in an individuals likelihood of receiving Narcotic Anonymous treatment, 2) marginalization predicts an increase in the likelihood of receiving treatment in a Methadone maintenance facility, and 3) privilege predicts an increase in an individuals likelihood of receiving the inpatient treatment type. There are two variables that have a significant impact across all three models. Legality of income and status of felony record both impact the likelihood of receiving a certain treatment type. Thus, marginalization in the form of an illegal income or a felony record does increase an individual’s likelihood of receiving both Narcotics Anonymous as well as Methadone treatment types. Inversely, privilege increases an individual’s likelihood of receiving the inpatient treatment type. In conclusion, having illegal income and/or a felony record increases the likelihood of receiving the lesser treatment forms, while, having legal funds and no felony record increases the likelihood of receiving the better treatment option. This means that while privileged folks get treatment for their addictions marginalized folks remain a permanent addict in 12-step or die from a drug related illness.
|Commitee:||Cox, Kiana, Spurgas, Alyson|
|School:||Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville|
|School Location:||United States -- Illinois|
|Source:||MAI 56/05M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Addiction, Addiction treatment, Marginalization, Privilige, Substance abuse, Substance use|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be