This cross-sectional descriptive correlational study was conducted to examine the relationships between and among the threat of breast cancer (objective and subjective risk), subjective stress, decisional conflict (uncertainty and factors associated with uncertainty), type of coping (approach and avoidance coping behaviors), and decisional outcome (treatment choice and decision effectiveness) in women making a treatment choice for their increased risk of developing breast cancer.
The sample consisted of 105 women who came to a high risk breast cancer clinic for a breast cancer risk assessment. Participants' ages ranged from 35-72. The majority of the women were married, Caucasian, highly educated, and employed fulltime. A booklet with four self-report questionnaires was used for data collection including a sociodemographic questionnaire developed by the researcher, Horowitz's Impact of Event Scale, O'Connor's Decisional Conflict Scale, and Lazarus and Folkman's Ways of Coping Revised Questionnaire.
Each hypothesis in the study was at least partially supported. Subjective stress and decision uncertainty were significant predictors for using approach coping behavior, but only subjective stress significantly predicted the use of avoidance coping behavior. The variance in treatment choice was significantly explained by subjective 5-year risk, factors associated with decision uncertainty, and objective risk, while the variance in decision effectiveness was significantly explained by decision uncertainty and factors associated with decision uncertainty. Lastly, approach coping behavior explained a small but significant amount of the variance in decision effectiveness.
Women at risk for developing breast cancer used approach and avoidance coping behaviors to manage the stress associated with their increased risk for breast cancer and consideration of treatment options. Women who used approach coping felt more certain about their treatment choice. Avoidance coping tended to be used by women who were uncertain about their treatment choice with a marginally significant positive relationship between avoidance coping and decision uncertainty. Women who were knowledgeable and clear about their values related to treatment options were more apt to select chemoprevention or prophylactic mastectomy, when appropriate, and felt they made an effective decision.
|Advisor:||Wineman, N. Margaret, Biordi, Diana L.|
|Commitee:||Biordi, Diana, Wineman, N. Margaret|
|School:||Kent State University|
|Department:||College of Nursing|
|School Location:||United States -- Ohio|
|Source:||DAI-B 78/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Behavioral psychology, Nursing, Cognitive psychology, Health care management, Oncology|
|Keywords:||Cognitive appraisal, Coping behaviors, Decisional conflict, High-risk for breast cancer|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be