In today's economic climate, state public institutions of higher education face challenges on multiple fronts. This applies particularly to state funding as it relates to the financing of the mission of the institutions. The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine the effectiveness of allocating state resources to state public institutions of higher education by comparing results from performance funding states to non-performance funding states. The focus was to determine whether the change to the performance funding methodology delivered the desired external accountability and institutional improvement in state public higher education. The research question guiding this study was: To what extent does the method of funding state public higher education, either performance or non-performance funding, predict the improvement in key higher education performance funding indicators between the years 2002 through 2009? Data collection and analysis investigated the rate of change in key higher education performance funding indicators at state public institutions of higher education in five performance funding states (Tennessee, Florida, Ohio, Connecticut, and South Carolina) in comparison to five states that do not employ performance funding (Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Massachusetts, and Maryland). The general hypothesis tested was: State public institutions of higher education in states that employ a performance funding methodology will experience a statistically significant increase in performance funding indicators that is greater than in states that employ a non-performance funding methodology. Data were analyzed using the Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) with a focus on individual change over time. The findings revealed that method of funding was not a statistically significant predictor of either the initial status or the rate of change of graduation rate or retention rate over the eight-year period, although institution type and enrollment were. The study recommends further research of performance funding outcomes, state funding levels, and other environmental factors.
|Commitee:||Bagaka's, Joshua, Foltin, Craig, Monaghan, Catherine, Nordgren, R.D., Rogers, Elice, Stead, Graham|
|School:||Cleveland State University|
|Department:||College of Education and Human Services|
|School Location:||United States -- Ohio|
|Source:||DAI-A 78/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Education finance, Higher Education Administration, Education philosophy|
|Keywords:||Performance funding, Public higher education finance, State higher education policy|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be