Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Inventive Thought in Endogenous Economic Development: An Empirical Comparison of Darwinian and Lamarckian Approaches
by Kim, Songpyo, Ph.D., Cleveland State University, 2011, 150; 10631195
Abstract (Summary)

The importance of knowledge creation in economic development has been enormously emphasized in recent years. Inventions are the first step for innovations that leads to further economic growth. Moreover, when new ideas are created endogenously from within a regional system, rather than from outside, they may lead to internally-generated economic growth and development. Accordingly, this study aims to understand 'the process of generating creative ideas' for endogenous regional economic growth. On the basis of data that reflects the perspectives of actual inventors, the researcher adopted both qualitative and quantitative research methods. The qualitative methods were oriented toward phenomenology and were based upon interviews designed to understand how inventors personally experience the process of invention. The quantitative methods were based upon a mail-out survey of inventors and an in-class survey of students. The surveys were designed to test hypotheses about Darwinian theories of creative thought processes. Interview results provide evidence of both Darwinian theory and Lamarckian theory. Survey results reveal that students' perspectives on invention are more consistent with Darwinian theory than are the perspectives of inventors. From these empirical results, the Darwinian hypothesis for the generation of creative ideas is disconfirmed; however these results do not definitely prove Darwinian theory to be incorrect. From a Darwinian point of view, endogenous economic growth led by new ideas takes the form of “blind-variation and selective-retention”. Economic development policy based on Darwinian theory should encourage people to generate various ideas and select one of them at the local and individual level. This can also be applied to regional policies that focus on various industries and academic fields. In contrast, Lamarckian theory supports top-down approach and focuses on few promising industries and academic fields that are designed from centralized planning.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor:
Commitee: Bowen, Chieh-Chen, Bowen, William, Stivers, Camilla, Stough, Roger
School: Cleveland State University
Department: Urban Affairs
School Location: United States -- Ohio
Source: DAI-B 78/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International
Source Type: DISSERTATION
Subjects: Economics, Psychology, Urban planning
Keywords: Economic development, Evolutionary theory, Inventive idea
Publication Number: 10631195
ISBN: 9780355014754
Copyright © 2018 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy
ProQuest