A central question in the physics of high-temperature superconductors is how superconductivity is lost at the extreme ends of the superconducting phase diagram, underdoping and overdoping. When mobile holes are removed from optimally doped cuprates, the transition temperature TC and superfluid density nS(0) decrease in a surprisingly correlated fashion. I succeeded in producing and measuring homogeneous underdoped high-temperature superconducting films by partially substituting Ca+2 for Y+3 in Y Ba2Cu3O7–δ films with reduced oxygen concentrations in the CuO chains.
I test the idea that the physics of underdoped cuprates is dominated by phase fluctuations by measuring the temperature dependence of superfluid density nS(T) and by changing the dimensionality of the system from 3D thick samples to 2D ultrathin films. Thick Y1–xCaxBa2Cu3O7–δ films are in agreement with previous measurements of pure Y Ba2Cu3O7–δ samples and do not show any 2D or 3D-XY critical regimes in the temperature dependence of superfluid density. Moreover, the transition temperature has a square-root dependence on absolute superfluid density at zero temperature, rather than showing the predicted linear dependence in the case of strong thermal phase fluctuations. When superfluid density is measured in underdoped 2D Y1–xCaxBa2Cu3O7–δ films as thin as only 2 unit cells for all doping levels, nS(T) has a dramatic downturn consistent with a 2D vortex-antivortex pair unbinding transition and, at severe underdoping, TC is linearly proportional to nS(0). This dimensionality-dependent scaling relation is the result of quantum phase fluctuations that suppress superconductivity near a Quantum Critical Point at zero temperature. Further measurements in an additional family of high-temperature superconductors, La2–xSrxCuO4, are consistent with my results in underdoped Y1–xCaxBa 2Cu3O7–δ.
La2–xSrxCuO4, also provided the opportunity to study the other extreme end of the superconducting phase diagram. In the overdoped region, as carrier density increases, supefluid density and the transition temperature are both suppressed. While it still remains uncertain what produces this suppression, a plausible interpretation is that only a small fraction of the hole carriers contribute to the superfluid density and the pair breaking effects are so important that they destroy superconductivity.
|Advisor:||Lemberger, Thomas R.|
|Commitee:||Honscheid, Klaus, Lemberger, Thomas R., Sooryakumar, R., Trivedi, Nandini|
|School:||The Ohio State University|
|School Location:||United States -- Ohio|
|Source:||DAI-B 78/11(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Low Temperature Physics, Physics, Condensed matter physics|
|Keywords:||Condensed matter physics, Low temperature physics, Superconductivity|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be