Hans Urs von Balthasar was one of the most prominent Roman Catholic theologians of the twentieth century and has inspired a thriving ecosystem of secondary scholarship, with impassioned critics and determined defenders churning out a steady stream of scholarship as expansive as Balthasar’s own massive body of work. This wealth of secondary scholarship is not, however, without a penumbral character. Due to the controversies that have—not without reason—plagued Balthasarian studies, it is often more akin to a war-strewn battleground than a lively and productive dialogue in various areas. By engaging with the work of Gilles Emery and Thomas Joseph White, this thesis explores the ways in which overly rigid interpretations—due to what I call readerly rigidity—can impede an attempt to productively read and present (and critique) Balthasar’s theology. The goal herein is not to counter their critiques, but rather to challenge how those critiques are made.
|Advisor:||Murdoch, Jessica M.|
|Commitee:||Hughes, Kevin L.|
|Department:||Theology and Religious Studies|
|School Location:||United States -- Pennsylvania|
|Source:||MAI 56/04M(E), Masters Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Religion, Religion, Philosophy, Theology|
|Keywords:||Catholic theology, Christology, Descent into hell, Hermeneutics of charity, Thomism, von Balthasar, Hans Urs|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.