With PQDT Open, you can read the full text of open access dissertations and theses free of charge.
About PQDT Open
Search
Dissertation/Thesis Abstract
-
Other Available Formats:
-
Full Text - PDF
(26.93 MB)
We created 4 sequences of chess moves intended (and verified) as sufficiently good (2 sequences), in play quality, or bad (2 sequences) to induce contrast. In experiment 1, 24 experienced chess-players (USCF Elo > 1300) watched these sequences and rated them with regards to overall quality (−100 to +100) and estimated Elo ratings, a proxy for play quality, of the players involved. In experiment 2, a different group of 24 experienced chess-players rated the sequences of chess games by “How much better did the winner play than the loser?” on a 1 to 7 scale. Results revealed negative contrast (experiment 1) and no evidence of condensation (experiments 1 and 2) as well as the potential that one’s own actual Elo may have anchored the ratings given to one set of stimuli.
| Advisor: | Parker, Scott |
| Commitee: | Duval, Laura, Parker, Scott, Peynircioglu, Zehra |
| School: | American University |
| Department: | Psychology |
| School Location: | United States -- District of Columbia |
| Source: | MAI 56/04M(E), Masters Abstracts International |
| Source Type: | DISSERTATION |
| Subjects: | Logic, Cognitive psychology |
| Keywords: | Chess, Condensation, Contrast, Games, Hedonic, Quality |
| Publication Number: | 10247673 |
| ISBN: | 978-1-369-73695-3 |
