This study explored the influence of student-university fit on the matching of academically diverse, under-represented minority students’ college search and choice processes. To examine the relationship between academic match and student-university fit, a qualitative research design was used. This basic interpretive qualitative design incorporated a screening form, two semi-structured interviews, and document analysis over a nine-month, time-elapsed data collection process. The interview protocols, informed by Hossler and Gallagher’s (1987) three-stage model and Perna’s (2006) conceptual model, were administered to eight participants involved in a nonprofit college access program. Document analysis was used to gather data from transcripts, test scores, and college profiles to determine students’ academic match with the schools on their college lists and their final college choice. Vignettes captured each participant’s story, and the emergent themes described in detail larger ideas across participants resulting from the coding process. At their colleges of choice, five participants academically matched, two undermatched, and one overmatched. The study found that students’ college choice and academic match results from various student-university fit factors that are fluid and constantly changing. During the college process, students’ web of resources – including parents, guidance counselors, and college mentors – provides support, but many students still resort to making decisions independently when they feel overwhelmed. College counseling proves especially important for racial minorities and low-income students. In the past, college match research has focused solely on academic match, but students make their college choice based on a variety of factors, including location, major options, and cost. Together, Perna’s and Hossler and Gallagher’s conceptual models provided a framework for this study since using either model in isolation would result in a gap in understanding. Namely, Hossler and Gallagher’s model does not account for the counseling students receive throughout their process, and Perna’s model focuses on the college process as a whole but does not differentiate between the stages. College match research must focus on both academic and social fit to provide an accurate and comprehensive understanding of how students experience their college search and make their college choice.
|Advisor:||Jakeman, Rick C.|
|Commitee:||Kirshstein, Rita J., Klasik, Daniel J.|
|School:||The George Washington University|
|Department:||Higher Education Administration|
|School Location:||United States -- District of Columbia|
|Source:||DAI-A 78/08(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Keywords:||Academically diverse student, College choice, College search, High-achieving, Low-income student, Student-university fit, Undermatch|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be