This qualitative study explored teacher answers to one question: What factors influence teachers’ decisions to use, or not use, small group discussion. Research supports a variety of small group discussion approaches to meet a range of curricular goals. Despite the philosophical move to student-centered discussion approaches, and research supporting small group discussion as an effective literacy approach, teacher led whole class discussion continues as the dominant approach. An online teacher survey about teacher use of discussion generated fifteen teachers, grades two through eight, who were interviewed to gather data on their perspectives about student discussion.
Three themes emerged from the interview data: (1) Teachers’ perspectives about their philosophy of education differed between teachers who used small group discussion and whole class discussion, (2) Teacher’s talk about students differed between teachers who used small group discussion and whole class discussion, and (3) Teachers’ talk about the teacher’s role or purpose differed between teachers who used small group discussion and whole class discussion.
Based on the findings, the implications suggest that teachers who are successful at implementing small group discussion have reading related advanced degrees, they have adopted constructivist philosophies, perhaps through their advanced degrees in reading, and they benefit from administrative and collegial support. Without the reading education and the philosophy to support student-centered approaches, teacher comments revealed that even when school-wide literacy programs, designed to engage students in small group discussion, were implemented, teachers manipulated the program activities to fit their teacher-led style.
|Commitee:||Arya, Poonam, Larson, Mark|
|School:||Wayne State University|
|School Location:||United States -- Michigan|
|Source:||DAI-A 78/07(E), Dissertation Abstracts International|
|Subjects:||Language arts, Reading instruction|
|Keywords:||Critical literacy, Language development, Lit circles, Reading engagement, Reading motivation, Small group discussion|
Copyright in each Dissertation and Thesis is retained by the author. All Rights Reserved
The supplemental file or files you are about to download were provided to ProQuest by the author as part of a
dissertation or thesis. The supplemental files are provided "AS IS" without warranty. ProQuest is not responsible for the
content, format or impact on the supplemental file(s) on our system. in some cases, the file type may be unknown or
may be a .exe file. We recommend caution as you open such files.
Copyright of the original materials contained in the supplemental file is retained by the author and your access to the
supplemental files is subject to the ProQuest Terms and Conditions of use.
Depending on the size of the file(s) you are downloading, the system may take some time to download them. Please be