COMING SOON! PQDT Open is getting a new home!

ProQuest Open Access Dissertations & Theses will remain freely available as part of a new and enhanced search experience at

Questions? Please refer to this FAQ.

Dissertation/Thesis Abstract

Rising Power, Creeping Jurisdiction: China's Law of the Sea
by Kardon, Isaac Benjamin, Ph.D., Cornell University, 2017, 399; 10253226
Abstract (Summary)

This study explores the relationship between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the international legal system, with empirical focus on the exclusive economic zone (EEZ) regime as codified in the 1982 Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The main pattern explained is China's practice of international law in its maritime disputes, moving beyond a question of "compliance" with the relevant rules to instead address how China shapes the underlying legal norms, and vice versa. The analysis demonstrates that the EEZ regime transforms Chinese interests in maritime space, enabling systematic use of legal means of excluding others from disputed space along China's maritime periphery. Backed up by growing capacity (i.e., "rising power") to enforce its claims, China's purposive interpretation and flexible application of the norms of the EEZ regime manifest as "creeping" claims to jurisdiction and rights beyond those contemplated in UNCLOS III. These nominally jurisdictional claims enable the PRC's push toward closure, a broader strategic aim to control vital maritime space that includes political, military and economic components. Using a framework adapted from the transnational legal process theory of international law, the study proceeds to analyze Chinese practice in terms of four linked processes: interaction, interpretation, internalization, and implementation. Tracing these processes from China's early encounters with Western international law, through its participation in the conference to draft the law of the sea convention, and the subsequent efforts to incorporate EEZ rules into PRC law and policy, the empirical analysis reveals that China's engagement in transnational legal processes does not result in its obedience to liberal rules and norms. Rather, China's practice in the EEZ transforms the scope and content of those underlying norms, contributing to wider dysfunction in the law of the sea.

Indexing (document details)
Advisor: Katzenstein, Peter J.
Commitee: Carlson, Allen R., Cohen, Jerome A., Dutton, Peter A., Evangelista, Matthew A.
School: Cornell University
Department: Government
School Location: United States -- New York
Source: DAI-A 78/06(E), Dissertation Abstracts International
Subjects: Asian Studies, International Relations, International law
Keywords: China, Exclusive economic zone, International law, Law of the sea, Liberalism, Maritime disputes
Publication Number: 10253226
ISBN: 978-1-369-56067-1
Copyright © 2021 ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Policy